After I directly began working on the text of the essay, I began to notice how its form was being modified, some parts became unnecessary, and some came to the fore. For example, if before I was motivated by digital culture, now I understand that this is only a small part of my research. Issues of challenging and causing transformation on a sensory level have come to the fore for me. And with this, I must say, I feel more than in agreement. This is what I have been striving for the last two years.
I have formed a visual structure, which, I hope, will help me be a little more organized and clean in my narrative.
I still have questions about the study of the impact of changing the behaviour of spectators or their approach to war. I am only motivated by the fact that if propaganda was able to change the behaviour of people, then I can. Only, probably, it will take me a lot of time ... 20 years.
I also had to finalize my literature sheet. For example, after I chose Deleuze's “difference” I had to analyse his opponents. One notable critique I found in Claire Colebrook's book, "Deleuze: A Guide for the Perplexed." In this book, Colebrook discusses the tension between Deleuze's focus on becoming and difference and the equally important aspects of stability and identity in societal constructs. She explores how Deleuze's philosophy, while innovative and transformative, might risk undervaluing the elements of stability and continuity that are crucial for social cohesion and order.
Writing process
Thinking process and Verifying thoughts:
Bibliography and references
1. Colebrook, C. (2006). Deleuze: A Guide for the Perplexed. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Comments